<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Studying Institutions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://prisonnotebooks.com/2007/12/23/studying-institutions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://prisonnotebooks.com/2007/12/23/studying-institutions/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 23:35:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sayaka</title>
		<link>http://prisonnotebooks.com/2007/12/23/studying-institutions/comment-page-1/#comment-1069</link>
		<dc:creator>Sayaka</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 14:57:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prisonnotebooks.com/?p=148#comment-1069</guid>
		<description>Hi. Thanks for your comment. There are hundreds of articles written on the new institutionalism, but I think everyone starts with this article: Peter Hall and Rosemary Taylor, “Political Science and the Three New Institutionalisms,” Political Studies, December 1996. Other introductory books include: Douglas North, &quot;Institutions, Institutional Change, and Economic Performance&quot; and Kathleen Thelen et al, &quot;Structuring Politics.&quot;

The &quot;old institutionalism&quot; is basically detailed descriptive studies of different administrative, legal and political structures: Often very normative, little comparative or generalizing analyses. The new institutionalism is a bit more theoretical and &quot;scientific&quot; in that it tries to systematically compare and generalize features of institutions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi. Thanks for your comment. There are hundreds of articles written on the new institutionalism, but I think everyone starts with this article: Peter Hall and Rosemary Taylor, “Political Science and the Three New Institutionalisms,” Political Studies, December 1996. Other introductory books include: Douglas North, &#8220;Institutions, Institutional Change, and Economic Performance&#8221; and Kathleen Thelen et al, &#8220;Structuring Politics.&#8221;</p>
<p>The &#8220;old institutionalism&#8221; is basically detailed descriptive studies of different administrative, legal and political structures: Often very normative, little comparative or generalizing analyses. The new institutionalism is a bit more theoretical and &#8220;scientific&#8221; in that it tries to systematically compare and generalize features of institutions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: forrestal</title>
		<link>http://prisonnotebooks.com/2007/12/23/studying-institutions/comment-page-1/#comment-1068</link>
		<dc:creator>forrestal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2007 02:55:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prisonnotebooks.com/?p=148#comment-1068</guid>
		<description>Hi, sayaka, how are u? do u remenber me?
I&#039;m fine from yesterday I started my holiday.

Im interested in &#039;new institutionalism&#039;

what this idea is distingish from coventional insititutionalism ?

plitical approch or sciological ?

if you may ,tell me books or papaers of new insitutinalism.

see ya</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, sayaka, how are u? do u remenber me?<br />
I&#8217;m fine from yesterday I started my holiday.</p>
<p>Im interested in &#8216;new institutionalism&#8217;</p>
<p>what this idea is distingish from coventional insititutionalism ?</p>
<p>plitical approch or sciological ?</p>
<p>if you may ,tell me books or papaers of new insitutinalism.</p>
<p>see ya</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

